Friday, April 1, 2011

CUTE, ROMANCE AND INSPIRATIONAL LOVE QUOTES: By Theophilus Bota


What Love means to me

1.      "If u were tears i cud not let u to come out from ma eyes even if u could i cud drink u back to show how i care  about and love you"  
2.      "I think am a bad shooter becoz i keep on micng u may be my love is leaking"
3.      "if i could rearrange the letters of the ABC's i would put U and I together and next to each other forever...."
4.      " Love it when you no you are not dreaming but you feel as if you were"
5.      " Loving a guy is like loving the sport u admire the most, it is hard work, takes allot of your time, but it is worth getting hot, sweaty n upset about "
6.      " Do you love me because I'm beautiful or am I beautiful because you love me."
7.      " I may not get to see you as often as I like. I may not get to hold you in my arms all through the night. But deep in my heart I truly know, you're the one that I love, and I can't let you go."
8.      " I think about him every day and night. I just cant get him out my head, I told him everything he needed to know. Now I am waiting for him to tell me what he is thinking. The next thing I know I open my door and he is there. He hugs me and I knew it was love"
9.      "U can fall from the sky, U can Fall From a Tree, but the best way to fall is in love with me"
10.  " No Guy is Worth your tears and when you find one that is he wont make you cry."
11.  "Too many sleepless nights thinking of you, and when i wake up my tears are running side of my cheeks ,thinking how much i want to be with you and i'm going to miss you still even as a gay ass friend but yeah its part of life so ya!"
12.  "Your tears makes me wanna change the world so that it won't hurt you anymore..."
13.  " My love is knocking on your door if u open i will come and supper with u"
14.  "Love has its own time, its own season, its own reasons for coming and going. You cannot bribe it or coax it into staying. You can only embrace it when it arrives and give it away when it comes to you"
15.  I'd like to run away From you, But if you didn't come And find me ... I would die.
16.  "I want to be the only one to get the chance to see how amazing you really are"
17.  "If I could be anything in the world I'd be your tear so that I could be born in your eye live down your cheek and die on your lips"
18.  "If you're not the one, then why doses my heart tells me that you are?"
19.  "tRu LoV is when you miss him eVen b4 he LeaVes its when u cuLd Listen 2 him taLK aLL night n neVa get tiRed of heaRing his Voice its when the thought of his name giVes u butteRfLies n u see his smiLe when u cLose uR eyes . .this feeLing is *i r r e p l a c e a b l e*"
20.  "Nothing hurts more than realizing he meant everything to you and you meant nothing to him"
21.  "When you are alone, just look at the spaces between your fingers remember that in those spaces .You can see my fingers locked with yours fovever"
22.  "When you think your first falling in love, just then you realize your falling out of love"
23.  "Love can make you do some cray things... but what's really crazy is not being held in your arms...."
24.  "I ran up the door, and closed the stairs, said my pajamas and put on my prayers, turned off the bed and hopped into the light, all because you kissed me goodnight"
25.  "In my eyes you are the world but in yours you are one person
26.  "Relationships and trust go hand in hand"-Breanne Abbott "I am a sailor, you're my first mate We signed on together, we coupled our fate Hauled up our anchor, determined not to fail
27.  A kiss is a lovely trick designed by nature to stop speech when words become superfluous.
28.  A kiss makes the heart young again and wipes out the years.
29.  Love is what you've been through with somebody.'
30.  A loving heart is the beginning of all knowledge.
31.  A man falls in love through his eyes, a woman through her ears.
32.  A man in love is not complete until he is married. Then he is finished.
33.  A man reserves his true and deepest love not for the species of woman in whose company he finds himself electrified and enkindled, but for that one in whose company he may feel tenderly 
34.  I could be martyrs for my religion Love is my religion and I could die for that. I could die for you.
35.  The greatest thing you'll ever learn is to love and be loved in return.
36.  Brief is life but love is long.
37.  But love is blind, and lovers cannot see
38.  The pretty follies that themselves commit.
39.  By night on my bed I sought him whom my soul loveth..




Thursday, August 5, 2010

THE REALITY OF BAPTISM IN TODAY'S LIFE: By Oscar Dama

Oscar Dama
INTRODUCTION
Baptism is one of the most important concepts in Christian faith. It is a Biblical concept, especially in the New Testament it is talked about in many places Baptism is a holy sacrament: John the Baptist practiced it (Matthew 3:11; Luke 3), Jesus was baptized and he also commanded his disciples to baptize (Matthew 28:19); the church fathers practiced it. Baptism is one of the most important rituals in the church. It is also means of grace.
Actually, the topic “baptism” is so broad but I would like to concentrate on the understanding of John the Baptist about this topic.  My key text is from the Book of Matthew which says: “I baptize you with water for repentance. But after me will come one who is more powerful whose sandals I am not fit to carry. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and Fire” (Matthew 3:11). I am going to deal with the key elements of this verse in great depth. First, it is my desire to define the term baptism; then, look at the significance of the baptism; followed by explaining the different baptisms mentioned in the verse, that is: baptism with water, baptism with the Holy Spirit and fire.

Definition
The definition of baptism, according to Grider, is a sacrament that asserts outwardly that the recipient is in an inward state of grace. According to Migliore, sacraments are enactments of the gospel by means of which the Spirit of God communicates to us the forgiving, renewing, and promising love of God in Jesus Christ and enlivens us in faith, hope, and love.” The English Dictionary defines baptism as the application of water to a person as a sacrament or religious ceremony by which he is initiated into the church of Christ. Baptism also refers to an outpouring of the Holy Spirit – Jesus told his disciples that “In a few days you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit ….You will receive power when the Holy Spirit comes on you and you will be my witnesses to the ends of the earth” It is also understood as an act, experience, or ordeal by which one is purified, sanctified, initiated, or named, such as a soldier’s first experience under enemy’s fire. Both Purkiser and Esselstyn write that baptism is a symbol. For Purkiser, “In practice baptism refers to the rite in which water is used as a symbol of person’s faith in Christ and his connection with the Church.”

Significance of the Baptism of John
The question might surely come asking about the importance of taking time to study the about the baptism of John the Baptist. First and far most, the significance of the baptism of John the Baptist lies on the fact that Jesus Christ our Lord received this baptism. The Bible records that, Jesus came from Galilee to the Jordan to be baptized by John (Matthew 3:13). Actually for John the Baptism, baptism was the sign of repentance and public testimony of the person’s candidacy for the kingdom of heaven. Jesus endorsed John’s use of baptism by His own submission to the rite and His public avowal of the practice, though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples (John 4:2). For Jesus baptism with water was not a need in actual spiritual sense, but it was a public acknowledgement of His identity with transgressors (Isaiah 53:12), and it was fitting or becoming that He should be an example for His followers. Jesus was baptized as a fulfillment of all righteousness (Matthew 3:15). So, baptism of John biblical and is also the most important practice in the Church.

According to Erickson, “almost all Christian Churches practice the rite of baptism.” They do so in a large part because Jesus Christ in his final commission commanded the apostles and the church to go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing the in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19). Baptism was widely practiced in the New Testament times by John the Baptist, by Jesus’ disciples, by Paul somewhat, and by various other persons according to the Book of Acts. Grider states it clearly that baptism is important not only biblically but also historically. “Through all the centuries, almost all Christian groups have believed in and practiced it. Baptism is emphasized in the Didache; the fathers including the reformers, John Wesley, and others, also emphasized it.”

The most important thing about John’s baptism is the ethical significance attached to it. Buttrick records that, John bade the Pharisees and the Sadducees to bear fruits that befit repentance. John’s baptism is thus a rite of moral purification designed to prepare those submitting to it to face the Day of the Lord, confident that those who repented would be forgiven and granted a place in the future Messianic Community. Calvin understood John’s baptism that it demanded a change in the life of the baptizand that is why John expected to see the fruits worthy of repentance of those who come to be baptized. In fact, the change of the heart will not be complete by the water baptism but the Lord Jesus Christ who baptizes with the Holy Spirit and with fire. That is the reason why Esselstyn speaks confidently that water baptism is just a symbol- it does not save anyone. A person who has been baptized will only go to heaven if he accepts Jesus as his Savior.

Baptism is the means of grace; it is also in keeping with our Christian faith, and also in keeping with the covenant emphasis of our Judeo-Christian faith. In trying to emphasize the significance of baptism, Dunning writes that the doctrine of the church is not complete until we examine (the sacraments) symbols by which the body of believers appropriates its history and the sources of its life.

Key Concepts in John’s Baptism
In his preaching, John the Baptist set the distinction between water baptism which is understood by some theologians as preparatory, and the Baptism in the Holy Spirit and with fire. Looking at the way John placed the baptism with the Holy Spirit and with fire, we can also see the significance of this baptism attached to it. John is trying to show the superiority of the one who sent him. Those who receives the awakening for their situation of lostness and repent their sins should long for the baptism with the Holy Spirit in order to be cleansed from their sins. According to Dunning, the baptism of John was an outward sign that repentance had occurred as a preparation of the new age that was at hand. However, looking carefully at these baptisms we will be able to see the significance of each one of them.

Baptism with Water
Grider records that John the Baptist attached great importance to water baptism. Those who repented, he gladly baptized. Christian water baptism is initiatory. Buttrick wrote that, the term baptism is employed in the New Testament mainly of the rite practiced by John the Baptist, and of the Christian rite which, from the day of Pentecost onward, was a regular means of initiation into the Christian community. He also defines baptism as a rite using water as a symbol of religious purification. Actually, we see in the Church today that when baptism is administered to infants and other small children,
“It initiates them into a prevenient-grace, and it advertises and asserts that they are members of the kingdom of God- the sphere where God reigns in frequent providential helps and in occasional miracles. When administered to believers, baptism asserts to the church and to the world that the recipient has received to Christ as Savior and Lord, having repented and believed the gospel.”

Grider shows that Christ emphasized on the significance of both water and Spirit baptisms in his statement: “I tell you the truth, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born of water and the Spirit” (John 3:5). According to Grider, the phrase “born of water” is surely a reference to water baptism, being practiced and emphasized by John the Baptist right at that early period of Jesus’ public ministry. Water baptism has theological significance attached to it: according to Grider, it affirms the importance of physicality and of the concrete act –in distinction from what is merely conceptual.

Baptism with the Holy Spirit and with Fire
Buttrick writes about Jon’s baptism, that he contrasts his own baptism with a future baptism to be administered by the mightier one, “the thong of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie; he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. He went on to say that the contrast in the Baptist’s teaching between his own baptism with water and the future baptism of the mightier one with the Holy Spirit and with fire would suggest that in the new dispensation water baptism would have been superseded. However, we need to understand that John would not have this kind of an idea anyway, knowing himself as not the Messiah but the forerunner to the Messiah he would probably want to humble himself and let the Christ be exalted. The water baptism is still remarkable in the Christian faith and it has remained to be the authority behind Christian baptism.

According to Calvin, John’s statement is that he presents Christ as the author of spiritual baptism, and himself as only the minister of outward baptism. John’s reply denotes that did not proceed to baptize without authority; but that his office as minister of an outward symbol, takes nothing away from the power and glory of Christ. Calvin continues to say that John did not intend to distinguish his baptism and that which Christ taught his disciples, and which intended should remain in perpetual obligation in his Church. He does not contrast one visible sign with another visible sign, but compares the characters the characters of the master and servant with each other, shows what is due to the master, and what is due to the servant. The teaching of John of baptism as in Matthew 3:11 helps us to understand what is done in baptism by men, and what is accomplished in it by the Son of God. To men has been committed nothing more than the administration of an outward and visible sign the reality dwells in Christ alone. In other words, the truth of baptism comes and proceeds from Christ alone. John’s baptism points people to Christ the one and only who washes souls with his blood through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Clerk tries to explain the meaning of John’s teaching of the baptism with the Holy Spirit that John wanted to show that Christ’s religion was to be a spiritual religion, and was to have its seat in the heart. Outward precepts, however, well they might describe, could not produce inward spirituality. This was the province of the Spirit of God, and of him alone; therefore He is represented here under the similitude of fire, because he was to illuminate and invigorate the soul, penetrate every part, and assimilate the whole to the image of God of glory. As Calvin says, Christ alone bestows all that grace which is figuratively represented by outward baptism, because it is he who sprinkles the conscience with his blood. It is he also who mortifies the old man and bestows the Spirit of regeneration. The word fire is added as an epithet, and is applied to the Spirit, because he takes away our pollutions, as fire purifies gold. Earle mentions that the most significant statement in the preaching of John the Baptist while he baptizes with water is that he wanted to put a distinction between the religion of Christ so to say, and other religions that have baptized with water. The distinctive Christian baptism is that with the Holy Spirit. Earl refers to the fire of the Holy Spirit consuming the canal nature. According to Macklen the addition “and fire” points to the cleansing as the essence of Messiah’s baptism. John calls attention to the description of Christ’s coming in Malachi 3:2- “He is like a refiner’s fire”. Brown rejects the view held by other theologians that baptism with the Holy Spirit and with fire refers to baptism of the impenitent with hell-fire…instead it is the fiery character of Spirit’s operations upon the soul- searching, consuming, refining, sublimating- as nearly all good interpreters understands the words. The fire of the Holy Spirit burns our sins out of us, and remakes us. Campbell writes that, “He shall whelm you the fire- whelming of the Holy Ghost that burns your sins out of you, and remakes you”

Conclusion
The most important part of studying about John’s baptism is that we come to know that this baptism is not forgotten in the Christian Church. The baptism John is still being practiced in the Church – believers are being baptized with water as a symbol, a public act which witnesses to what God has done in a believer’s life, a testimony to an already existing faith from which it is separated in time, an act of obedience and following of Christ. Water baptism can not save someone – there some people who by being baptized they start claiming that they are on their way to heaven yet their lives do not show the fruits of repentance. So John’s teaching of baptism plays an important role in discouraging such a dangerous claim from among people in the church. People should be longing to have a good relationship with the Lord, then baptism will come as a symbol of what the Lord is doing in their hearts.

John preaching helps people to be aware of their lostness and at the same time John also points people to Christ- giving comfort and showing how they may get rid of their sins. That is the same thing every preacher of the gospel is supposed to do. The Church is supposed to direct people to Christ who is to redeem them from their sins, if they accept him in true faith. According to Luther, there are two important offices for church that are revealed in John teaching of baptism. The first office says: “You are all sinners, and are wanting in the way of the Lord.” When we believe this, the other office follows and says; “Listen, accept Christ, believe in him, he will free you of your sins. In fact, John makes it clear that, each one is to know himself and his need of becoming a better man; yet he is not to look for this in himself, but in Jesus Christ alone.
Reference

Brown, David. Matthew – John: A Commentary on the Old and New Testament. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmanns Publishing Co, 1948.

Buttrick, George Arthur. The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible V1. New York: Nashville, Abingdon Press, 1962.

Calvin, John. Commentary on Harmony of the Evangelists: Matthew, Mark, & Luke. Michigan: Grand Rapids, Baker Book House, 1610. (1993).

Clerk, Adam. Adam Clerk’s Commentary (One-Volume Edition). Missouri: Kansas City, Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 1967.

Cross, Anthony R. The Evangelical Sacrament Article. Retrieved on 17/03/2010 from http://web.ebscohost.com

Dunning, Ray. Grace, Faith, and Holiness. .Kansas City: Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 1988.

Earl, Ralph. Beacon Bible Commentary, V.6. Missouri: Kansas City, Beacon Hill Press, 1964

Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Michigan: Baker Book House, 1985.

Esselstyn, Theodore. Following Jesus Together. Florida: Nazarene Publishing House, 1996.
Grider, Kenneth J. A Wesleyan-Holiness Theology. Missouri: Kansas City, Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 1994.

Holy Bible, New International Version

Lenker, John Nicholas. Sermons of Martin Luther, V1. Michigan: Grand Rapids, Baker Book House, 1905.

Macklen, Philip A. St Matthew (Westminster Commentaries). London: Methuen & Co. 1917.

Morgan, Campbell. Gospel According to Matthew. New York: Fleming H. Revell Co. 1929.

Purkiser, W.T. Exploring Our Christian Faith. Missouri: Kansas City, Beacon Hill Press of Kansas City, 1978.

The Complete Christian Dictionary for Home, School, and Office. Geneva: David Foundation, 2002.

A CASE STUDY ABOUT WORSHIP IN AFRICAN CONTEXT

INTRODUCTION
The term ‘worship’ has been variously defined by different writers, in most cases to suit the purpose of their writing. Writing for evangelicals, Adeyemo describes ‘Christian worship’ as the deliberate act of seeking to approach reality at its deepest level by becoming aware of God in and through Jesus Christ and by responding to this awareness. The English word for worship literally means, “Worth ship” denoting the worthiness of an individual to receive special honor in accordance with that worth. Worship is the spontaneous act as the heart of the worshiper mediates on the glory and majesty of God as revealed either special or general revelation. Mbiti simply writes: “worship broadly means man’s act or acts of turning to God” Dr. Stanton said that according to R. B. Allen true worship is: “The peoples grateful response to the Living God; Done according to His command; Each from a free and willing heart; Seeking to bring glory to His person.”

DEFINITION OF WORSHIP IN AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE
The concept of worship is so broad and approached differently in African context. This gives an idea that there is no necessarily the grand and universal but it embraces the general understanding about worship by most Africans. Mbiti argued that, “to consider
Worship from an African perspective is to consider the human body in all of its abilities\disabilities—senses and movements—in actions not limited to the mind’s capacity to reason.” Despite all the differences, the view of worship in African context is not far away from the biblical perspective. In most cases churches have equated worship to the Sunday service or programs. The failure to understand the definition of worship brings slow spiritual development in most African churches. One of the African writer by the name Omondi argued “To worship God is to quicken the conscience by the holiness of God, feed the mind with the truth of God, purge the imagination by the beauty of God, open the heart to the love of God and devote the will to the purpose of God” In this definition we can see that worship is broad and focus to God as object of worship “The audience in Christian worship is God. We as the worshipers offer to God sacrifices that we will be acceptable.” It is an active response to God where we declare His worth. This is what I exactly witnessed at the Deliverance church where people were actively participating in worship with joyous. Africans regard worships not as passive, but participative.
For instance at the Evangelical Pentecostal church, during the whole service people were so active through singing, dancing raising up their hands and do so many expressive actions. During worship service congregants ascribe to Him supreme worth; for He alone is worth. The essence of worship is also related to cerebration in African context. “Christian worship is always cerebration; this is so because of victory is the basis of Christian worship. No wonder most African worship styles today are contemporary styles. Whatever is done in Christian worship is done as participation in God’s victory through Jesus Christ” In Africa Worship is both regarded as the act of an individual as well as corporate though corporate seems to be adopted most and preferred to individual by most Africans. The understanding of the former makes the latter to be effective.

THE ROLE OF WORSHIP IN AFRICAN CONTEXT
The understanding of the concept of worship by the African it’s not really contrary to the Biblical view of worship. Of course Africans do admit that the way our grandparents used to worship it’s not exactly the way we worship today. However the concept of worship is all about giving reverence to “somebody” worthy in this case God. “Africans find it very relevant to worship God for several reasons. Many African Christians see worship as the communion and communication with God, the Creator, the Provider, the Sustainer, the Friend, and the Healer of mankind.” I remember one of the churches that I visited; Deliverance Church Ongata Rongai had a banner in front of it written “We enter in the glory of Almighty one God, Jehovah” Throughout the five churches that I have visited, I have been able to collect data both during the service as well as personal interviews. 

Why Africans worship? 
The following are the reasons that most African Christians gave me why they worship: 
  • It nourishes the spirit. It assists in achieving spiritual growth. 
  • Worship  reveals God to you. 
  • When one is worshiping he or she meet God. 
  • It helps one to know God better. 
  • It encourages others in their spiritual development. 
  • It shows the world where your priorities are. 
  • Worship is also regarded as a means of expressing my love for God. 
  • It is an avenue God has provided by which man can praise His name. 
  • It is the offering of spiritual sacrifices. 
  • God gave us the spiritual gifts so we have to use them in worship. I
  • t is a way of showing my thanksgiving to God for all He has done for me. 
  • It is a period of communion with God with the world shut out entirely. 
  • It helps to sustain and expand the fellowship in African community.

WORSHIP STYLES IN AFRICAN CONTEXT
“African” worship is necessarily dynamic, incorporating the entirety of creation’s experience. “As human beings our expressions of worship are informed and shaped by our environments—including that which is ecological, cultural, socio-political, historical and contemporary.” It is difficult to point out that there is one particular worship styles that fit all African churches. Despite the issue of denominations, worship styles in African context are shaped by different cultures. It is common to find two different worship styles in one denomination depending on the cultures where the church is located. 

For example worship in the church of the Nazarene in Swaziland is different from the way people in the church of the Nazarene worship in Malawi. So I legitimately say that denomination does not appear to be an important issue for many African congregations. Nkhata pointed out that some churches in Africa follow contemporary styles of worship while others liturgical style of worship. But it seems many Pentecostal churches in Africa today preferred the contemporary style to liturgical. There are churches that strictly emphasize the liturgical styles for instance Roman Catholic. On the other hand, other churches prefer contemporary like what I witnessed at. I noted that hand clapping, a loud cry of excitement and foot stomping during the praise songs were almost encouraged at Nairobi Pentecost Church. The church had full set of Modern equipments that made worship so interesting and joyous. The equipments such as guitars, drums, and electronic keyboards, piano were available. Reed in one of his articles argued that worship styles in African context are also influenced by the culture where the particular church is located. For instance the use of drums, its debatable when it comes to worship depends on the culture. People in Swaziland for example or the Lomwe tribe in Southern part of Malawi they don’t use drums because it is associated with witchcraft or calling the ancestors for worship and performing some rituals and sacrifices. Some churches also in African context follow Revivalist style of worship for instance, Seed of Life Pentecostal church. The style is always organized on the premises of saving the lost, encourage the believers to witness. Sometimes they organize the crusades for evangelism purpose.

ELEMENTS OF WORSHIP IN AFRICAN CONTEXT
Prayer
Prayer is one of the aspects of worship. It is the essential mark of the church; it is the center of the church’s spiritual power and pilgrimage. Nthamburi identifies that prayer is the climax of worship in most of the independent churches. It is taken seriously in the worship life of the African congregations. Many congregation values both intercessory prayers especially before they begin the Main service. This is what normally takes place at the University church of the Nazarene every Sunday. Other forms of prayer include invocation, pastoral and others in the midst of worship service. “Authentic worship includes some moments of prayers. In his book worship in our community Kamwana contented that, “Prayer begins by intellectual adjustment. By thinking of God earnestly and humble to the exclusion of other objects of thoughts, by deliberately surrendering the mind to spiritual things, by preparing the consciousness for the inflow of new life.” Muzorewa said, Prayer in Africa is the act which accompany the sacrifices and offerings, here someone need to pronounce the words. For example “the kikuyu of Kenya pray to their Supreme God, ‘Mwene-Nyaga,’ expecting their prayers to be favorably answered in return for the present given.

Proclamation
The proclamation of the word of God is one of the essential parts of the worship in African context. In most evangelical churches, worship service without the preaching of word is considered as incomplete. Rev Wambui of African Inland Church pointed out that preaching of word is not always pleasant to hear in many Africans than singing and dancing, but it is for our own good. No wonder many churches allocate only an average of 15 or 20 minutes of proclamation. For instance the church that I attended in Rongai- Grace of God church, the preacher preached only 10 minutes sermon. The preaching of word during worship must convince, rebuke, and exhort. Some churches, the schedule for preaching is well developed and people knows what type of sermon and the speaker before the actual date comes. Sometimes preaching is also done in series or theme. For instance during the month of June, University church of the Nazarene, has been emphasizing on the theme ‘Spirit filled life.’

Praise and Adoration
One of the elements of worship is praising and adoring God. During this time, the worshippers sing the songs that focus on adoring and praising God. Regardless the worship styles or cultural influences, music is part of the African worship. In these Modern days, African churches have variety of worship songs including local and classics. In his thesis Magaya wrote; “Africans do not consider music as mere motif in worship but very essential phenomena in worship. Singing has shaped the African worship. The instruments that Africans use are also determined by the songs that the congregants sing. In the African context, the worship service without music is regarded as incomplete. Muthengi argued that Africans emphasizes music that allows dancing, shouting and making a lot of noise with vigorous jumping and more. Most contemporary styles of worship allocate long time of singing than any other element of worship. This is exactly what I witnessed at Rongai Church of the Nazarene where singing and dancing took forty five minutes. Music prays a great role in African worship. Bishop Mzimbi said; “God has provided human beings with voices and songs to sing for the Lord. Music is allows any and all of the Africans to say something of real importance to and about God. “Some churches in African regard music as one of the very best ways to teach Biblical truth. What we sing we remember because we have combined power of intellect with emotion”

Testimony
It is rare to visit the worship service in African context and fail to single out any manifestation of testimony. Testimonies are part of the worship services in many churches. All the five churches that I have visited, testimony has been part of the worship service. Testimonies are done in different ways such as, speech, special as well as congregation songs. Sometimes a church choir is required to present a song as a form of testimony. I have witnessed this at House of God church where the youth choir gave a testimony through the presentation.

Response
Response is one of the elements of worship that is so much promoted in most churches in African context. Kanjoka pointed out that the response entails finding ways in which the church can invite the congregation to respond to the preaching of the Word. I would acknowledge that different churches has different mode of expressing their responses. Nevertheless, it is common for many preachers to invite people’s response especially at the end of the message. Sometimes people respond also by giving out willingly either their finances or non financial items. For instance during the Compassionate awareness Day at the University church of the Nazarene, a lot of people responded to the message of compassionate by giving clothes, soap, Notebooks and other staffs.

Offering
Just as the service without preaching is regarded as incomplete, the same applies to the service without offering. Mark agreed that Africans value offering so much as integral part of worship. Nowadays it has gone beyond whereby some churches are categorizing the money givers as the true worshipers. Monitory offering is so much encouraged in many African churches today. Bishop Mzimbi one day said; “some members stay at home when they do not have anything to give at the church.” This are some of the evidences to show that offering is so much valued in African churches. I once attended Seventh Day Adventist youth service in Rongai. I was surprised when the Master of the Ceremony announced that those who do not have monitory offering next week they should be prepared to give anything that they will be valuable to the kingdom of God. Despite monitory offering, it is also regarded as a symbol of commitment of all of our lives. It is a response to God in return for His faithfulness, His love, and His blessings.

Fellowship
The African people value communal way of living. People like corporate way of doing things and interact with each other. This has extended also to the worship services in many African churches. Fellowship is highly promoted in many denominations regardless the cultural or geographical setting. Pastor Selemani in one of his unpublished sermon said; “Africans are good either at home or in church in coming up with activities that create sense of belonging, family, an awareness of being a part of a loving community.” In many churches this is evidenced through greetings (mostly shaking hands), having a cup of tea, welcoming the visitors. For instance at the University church of the Nazarene, Senior Pastor immediately after the worship service he stands at the door shaking people’s hands as they go home. When I visited Nairobi Pentecost Church one Sunday, the Senior Pastor invited all the visitors to stand and greet the congregation. Fellowship is also expressed in Holy Communion. I experienced this at Rongai Redeemed church. Immediately when the Pastor finished preaching, he took us into the fellowship of Holy Communion

CHALLENGES THAT AFRICAN WORSHIP FACE TODAY
The world of today is not static. There are so many things that are happening across the world. Different worship styles have been adopted by churches in order to meet the demands of the day. Today the church in Africa is at stake. So many influences from Western countries are shaping the styles of worship in Africa. The issue of the songs is now a current debate in African whether people should continue with the old and tradition songs or Western songs. “The African churches that still hold and sing the old songs are regarded as primitive.” So many churches sing the songs that attract many young people. Technology has impacted much on the worship styles in African churches to the extent of losing its essence. “Worship services that are not accompanied with Modern instruments are regarded as backward and have less impact on the people.” This is what I observed in Diguna youth Ministry. We were all happy in adoring and praising God. Suddenly in the course of worship, electricity power went off. I was shocked to see that people stopped singing and the worship team members started to diagnose the problem and let people to sit down. This is one of the practical challenges that the church in Africa in facing. Many churches have made a vow not to sing worship songs without modern equipments. People schedule worship for the aim of fulfilling human emotions and desires. The other challenge still on the issue of songs is about the theology of African songs. Most worship songs carry the message that is contrary to the Christian doctrine. For instance when I visited Pentecostal Redeemed church, a group of young men and women presented the song which was in the language called Lingala. The song is called Tobina- kupepekale. This song is sung by the sexy dancers and it has no any message of glorifying God. Mbonyole in his article pointed out that if God seeks true worshipers His first field to search is in African churches.

Worship in African has been challenged by sycrenticism as well as norminalism. The African tradition religion has really affected the way of worship in most African churches. Cultural renewal in Africa has caused many people to rediscover their African past. Since culture and religion are so closely related in Africa, this has led to a return to tradition religion practices. Adeyemo pointed out that in African world view, God is often seen as distance and unapproachable. It is therefore seems quite reasonable that humans must relate to lesser spirits and divinities for the ordinary problems of their life and not bother God.” They do not realize that Jesus alone is more that able to meet their greatest need or crisis they may ever face. Some external challenges like poverty, hunger affect also worship in African context. As a communion of churches we live in various contexts all of which, in some form or another, challenge our confession that God has and does redeem creation. This challenge is explicit in much of modern day Africa, where war and disease, illiteracy and poverty, seem to counter our communal testimony that God, the Source of life, is just. How, then, in the midst of crisis, does the church proclaim with integrity God’s redeeming Word? More specifically, how does our worship, especially in African contexts, embody our conviction that all creation is restored and transformed through Jesus Christ? Venna Stanton pointed out that some other challenges of worship in Africa includes; less trained music leaders, poor theology, lack of preparation, and lack of equipments

CONCLUSION
As we have seen, worship in African context, it is difficult to single out that this is the most appropriate and universal style of worship for many churches. Despite all the worship styles that local congregation adopts; it seems contextualization plays an important role in worship. It is very possible to have worship that is acceptable in certain community but not acceptable in another community. But worship in African context has got its root from the biblical perspective though culture plays a big role especially when it comes to the worship styles and manifestations of the elements of worship. Today worship in African is quite facing a lot of challenges either from within or others. However, many worshiping styles in African context include all the elements of worship.


BIBLIOGRAPHY
Constantino, Magaya, Mosaic Tradition Worship, its relevance for current African evangelical worship with suggestions from western worship practices, Nairobi, Kenya, Africa Nazarene University, c2007.
Churches: Redeemed church, Deliverance, House of God, Nairobi Pentecost, African Inland, Manna, SDA Youth, University Church of the Nazarene, Rongai Nazarene
Francis Kanjoka. Worship as cerebration in African context: Blantyre: Harper & Row Publishers: 1978.
Groenfeldt, John S. We Gather Together: The Church Worships God: Virginia, CLC Press: 1971.
Gwinyai Muzorewa. The Origin and Development of African Theology, New York, Orbis Books, 1985.
Jayaran V. (2009), Contemporary music and church. Retrieved on 13th February 2010 from http// www.churchmusic.com
John S. Mbiti. African Religions and Philosophy, 2nd Ed Oxford, Heinemann Publishers, 1989.
Julius Muthengi. The work and worship of the church, east Africa journal of evangelical theology, 5:1 1996.
Klotz, John. W. African view of Worship, London, Publishing House St. Louis London, 1973.
Lucius Robinson. Universal Worship in Human being 2nd ed. USA, Charles Scribe Library of Congress, 1969.
Mark, R.A. The importance of Prayer, retrieved from http//www.uncornerstone.org on 20th February 2010.
Mbonyole, J.C, Why worshiping God? Retrieved from http//.www.worship.com on 16th February, 2010.
Melissa S. L. (2008), Praise and Adoration in Modern Language, Retrieved on 10th February 2010 from http// www.praiseGOD.com
Mitchell, H. Robert. Ministry and Music, Philadelphia, Westminster press. 1978.
Patrick Kamwana. Crisis in African worship and Music, Limbe, Kachere Book Press, 1993.
Patrick Phiri, African Tradition Worship, Blantyre; Malawi Claim Mabuku Publications, 1994.
Peter Omondi, African worship and Contextualization, Nairobi Press, 2007.
Richard Wambui, Lets Fellowship as a community, New and Old publications, 1987.
Robert, Webber E. Worship Old and New, Grand Rapid, Michigan: Zondervan publishing House. 1994.
Samuel Nkhata. Power of music in Worship, Blantyre, Nyumba ya Mabuku Publications, 1994.
Tokunboh Adeyemo. Salvation in African tradition, Nairobi, Evangel Publishing House, 1997.
Wilbur O’ Donovan. Biblical Christianity in Africa Perspective, Kwara state, Nigeria, Paternoster press, 1996.
Zablon J. Nthamburi, Ecclesiology of African Independent Churches, Nairobi, Action Publishers, 1998.

TO WHAT EXTENT SHOULD CHRISTIANITY BE INDIGENIZED AND REMAIN CANDID TO CARDINAL AUTHORITY OF THE BIBLE?


INTRODUCTION
“If Christianity is not indigenized in Africa then we are putting on a borrowed jacket which is of oversize”, said Professor Mugambi. Again one of the African theologians said, “African God cannot suffocate in the western garment.” All these are the cries of Africans to indigenize Christianity. But now the question we are raising is to what extent can Christianity be indigenized in Africa and still remain candid to the cardinal teachings of the bible? In this paper we are trying to answer this question.
CHRISTIANTY AS AN AFRICAN RELIGION
In his presentation Mbiti strongly argued that missionaries did not bring Christianity, it is God who brought them here to strengthen that which was already there. It’s obvious when we go back to the history of Christianity in Africa, Christianity started even before the coming of missionaries.[1] The article written by Mugambi stating that Christianity reached Africa within the apostolic period. This is evident in the conversion of the Ethiopian Eunuch and during the day of Pentecost when there were also some people from Africa who had come from Africa.[2] The men who really carried the Christian faith along the west coast in the mid-nineteenth century were nearly all Africans, many of them men and women rescued from the slave ships on the Atlantic and landed by the British navy at Free Town in Sierra Leon. Muzorewa argued; “African theologians are the first and the second generation Christians. The Christian missionaries from Europe and America penetrated into the interior of Africa either shortly before or simultaneously with colonial occupation. African Christian kingdom existed led by powerful divinely appointed mediators (Kings), which were centers of great cultural achievement and international trade.”[3]
AFRICAN CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIANS’ ARGUMENTS ON INDIGENIZING CHRISTIANITY
At the cultural level the missionary’s view of the relationships between Christianity and culture always prevails over that of the authentic response of the converts of the Gospel. There is a tendency to portray the missionary’s culturally conditioned Christianity as if it were identical with the Gospel itself. Theologically, we can suggest that the gospel has a universally relevant and applicable message which cannot be reduced to the strait—jacket of any culture, however sophisticated.[4] All cultures need the Gospel and are judged by it. 
When people of a particular culture accept the Christian faith, they are challenged to bring into a being community of believers which in tune with the needs of that situations. If the church is to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world, it is challenged to adjust itself to the changing world. The Bible is full of illustrations on how this adjustment can be effected. Mugambi argued that, “To most missionaries from Europe and North America, evangelization meant disorientating their objects of mission from pagan, heathen, savage, primitive and barbaric traditions. Thus on the scale of conversion the foreign missionary gave himself 100% while the prospective convert was supposed to start at zero.”[5]  In the contrast African theologians have suggested that in the process of evangelization there were no active senders and passive recipients. The missionary ought to be learners as much as the prospective convert is a receiver. Many denominations today have break away and established their own denomination in which they can interpret the Gospel without foreign paternalism. Nthamburi argued that African Christians remains African. In spite of the translated hymns and prayer-books foreign ecclesiastical vestment and architecture, theological training in a foreign language- in spite e all of these Africans in the imported denominations remain Africans and Christian at the same time.[6] If the missionary enterprise fails to be faithful to these perspectives, it will be by passed and the church in Africa will go as it has always done in history. Christianization of Africa is evident in every country south of the Sahara. Christianity has continued to have influence and prestige in many African countries after the attainment of constitutional independence, much to the amusement of those who thought Christianity would be discarded together with the relics of colonialism.[7]
The gospel should not be confused or mistaken with a particular interpretation or presentation. It is possible for a missionary agent to fail completely in winning converts and for a Church to grow paradoxically as a result of his effort. “The early church in Africa contributed in the immense preservation of the unity of Christian faith.  The African Church is being called to the abolition of a slave mentality among the African people and the establishment ones and for all of the instruments of the total liberation of the African people from centuries of foreign domination.”[8] The African people have failed to distinguish the missionary work and the western culture. Instead of taking the gospel, they have been adopting the Western culture. As a result the African heritage is losing its meaning due to the challenge the western culture has brought. This is evidently seen in the style of worship, language, dressing, preaching, and instruments. This has also affected evangelization among Africans by the Africans. Most Africans have a misconception of missionary work thinking that it only belongs to the westerners and they are the only people who qualify to do mission work. Africa has been regarded to be backward and uncivilized, political and culturally dark-continent prior to the missionary and the colonial advent in the 18th century. ATR was a dominant religion characterized by backward polytheism and animism. Cole suggests that authentic indigenization must be open constantly to the painful process of de-indegenization, for the sake of re-indegenization.[9]
FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN INDEGENIZATION
Victor Cole in the book, Issues in African Christian theology suggested the common factors that African theologians should consider in Africanizing the faith.
Philosophical factor
By philosophy he means the total world and life view as well as the though patterns of both the original context in which the Bible was given as well as those of the interpreters of the Bible today.  “Bible scholars are no strangers to what is referred to as Hebrew or Greco-Romans thought forms. Thought forms as well as world views are essential to the understanding of customs, habits, behaviors and messages, intra or inter culturally.”[10]  To successfully contextualize theology within a given culture today, both the thought forms, world and life views of the Bible as well as those of the contemporary culture must be well understood by the theologians.
Cultural factor
Culture has been described as the total way of life of a people in that regard it embraces thought patterns, and world and life views. However, culture is here delineated to emphasize this fact that there are differences in cultural appreciation of the particular teachings of the Bible. “If Christianity is also to be lived not to be just a matter of assent the contemporary socio- cultural factor must come in the fore ground, which must then provide the Christian with the constantly changing data which represents man’s situation in life.”[11]  To engage the word of God in a face to face confrontation with our situation in life is to strive to apply the absolute word to our lives. The culture diversities of our world necessitate differences in emphasis from one cultural to another.
Linguistic Factor
“Language is a vehicle of communication, and is also included in a comprehensive approach to the meaning of culture. However, language is singled out because of its importance in communication.”[12] Language conveys concepts and thought forms. The Christian theologians who want to indigenous ought to be able to work with the biblical languages, so he can have a feel for word concepts as close as possible to the original text. The meaning of concepts must be traced back to their original context. Hence contextual use of language ought always to take precedence in process of indigenizing.

Hermeneutical factor
This factor deals with the fair exegesis of the Biblical text. In the quest for meaning, priority ought to be given at all times to the context of the passage in question. Also vital in the quest for context meaning is the principle of allowing scripture to interpret scripture. “An understanding of the context of writing enhances our own understanding of the message of the Bible. Consequently, such an understanding enhances our ability to apply the message of the absolute word of God inscripturated to our particular contexts and cultures.”[13]  It is difficult to indigenize Christianity and remain true to the cardinal doctrine of the Bible if the hermeneutical factor is neglected. For many years, hermeneutic has been one of the outstanding factors in understanding as well as spreading the gospel.
 CRITIQUE
Most African theologians opt the idea of indigenizing Christianity. We would like to agree that the idea of indigenizing Christianity has both positive as well as negatives aspects. In the first place we would like argue on the positive side. The worship will be revived. As Africans, we acknowledge that worship has lost its essence in some parts due to Western influences. People have become blind in distinguishing western culture from Christianity. In most cases this is manifested through the use of foreign languages, dressings, music in worship services.   The use of foreign languages has made some worshipers feel out of place. Again dressing styles that some churches allow become disruptive in worship services. Indigenizing Christianity means our worship will be accommodative through the use of local and understandable languages, songs, and dressings that will not disrupt the weak brother in the worship service. The use of local languages will be an effective tool in evangelism. As a result, the gospel will find home in the hearts of many Africans because communication would have been made easy and accessible. The use of local music, Christological names for example ‘Baba Yesu’ will help Africa to redeem and maintain its heritage. However, indigenizing Christianity is not an easy task. Looking at the positive side and the need for indigenization, the question should be to what extent should Christianity be indigenized and remain candid to the cardinal teachings of the Bible? There are also negative outcomes of indigenization. Barrett pointed out that the issue of language is controversial because most of the theological studies that are done by most African theologians are foreign languages, in English to be precise.[14] For this reason it could be so complicated to indigenize Christianity based on language.
Some of the African names are associated with African Traditional Religions of which when they are used, they raise many so debates among Africans themselves for example, regarding Jesus as an ancestor. There is a danger that conceiving of Christ as an Ancestor may actually encourage people to think of their ancestors as intermediaries, while the scriptures clearly teach that we have just one mediator between God and humanity: Jesus Christ; Africans may be encouraged to actually worship the ancestors and place them in a position that only God should hold by offering to them sacrifices and oblations; It seems to make Jesus just another human being rather than God-incarnate.  The scriptures clearly condemn necromancy (consulting the dead) and that is precisely what happens in much focus on the ancestors. However significant and weighty the above reasons for rejecting the image of Christ as ancestor are, our focus here has not been on any of them.
Our focus has been exclusively on the question of whether the image of Christ as Ancestor, if it were to become commonly employed in the churches of Africa, would contribute to or diminish the kind of ethnocentrism and tribalism that were mentioned at the beginning of this article. In addressing this, it should be acknowledged that the very African theologians who have put this image before us are not oblivious to the dangers associated with this kind of inculturation or contextualization. Indeed, they are very much aware that inculturation taken too far can easily lead to syncretism. They have fought valiantly to couch their Christologies in ways that protect them from incorporating unchristian practices into the church. Bujo is a good example at this point. In the following quote he even notes that his understanding of ancestorship transcends ethnic and tribal boundaries. “At the same time, Jesus corrects and completes the traditional morality.
The moral perspective is no longer limited to my clan, my elders, my friends, but extends to the whole human race, in loving service of the Father. The morality of the disciple who accepts Jesus as Model and Proto-Ancestor is a personal re-enactment of the passion, death and resurrection of Jesus. It is this new perspective which must be henceforth the constitutive principle of African Christian ethics. The history of the Crucified One must be subversive for the customs and practices of both traditional and modern Africa. From the standpoint of tradition, the remembering of Jesus is a challenge to conscience, urging the elimination from life of those mistakes which might be labeled ‘the specific errors of African group life’. The integration of the memory of the passion, death and resurrection of Jesus is leaven which, when necessary, precisely in the name of a wider humanizing of Africa, causes certain venerable clan traditions to be abandoned.”[15] We are living in a multicultural and multiracial society where most churches are occupied with people from different cultural dimensions and backgrounds. In this case it can be so challenging to indigenize Christianity in a pluralistic society. From the inception of the History of Christianity in Africa, sycrenticism has been a challenge. People have been failing to distinguish between culture and religion and in this case Christianity. The other question we may ask ourselves in trying to indigenize Christianity is that which one should dictate the cream of Christianity or to have a loud voice between the Bible which is universal and the Culture? There is need for African theologians to base their strategy of indigenization on the authority of Bible than focusing much on western Christianity and culture. Africans should bear in mind that not everything that is from the west is a thorn in the fresh of African Christianity. The message of the Bible if well interpreted and understood can fit in every culture. Because the message of the Bible is universal and it is applicable to any person regardless of geographical setting and cultural background.
CONCLUSION
As we have seen, the hunger and the thirsty for indigenizing Christianity in Africa are the peak among African theologians as well as the laity. The challenges that Christianity is facing today are the ones that are prompting and propelling Africans to cry and fight for indigenization. This shows how passionate the local theologians and the laity are for the gospel. However, as pointed already indigenizing Christianity in Africa is a great task which demands a lot of planning as well as time. Indigenization is possible and it can be achieved. However, due to the diversity of cultures we have in Africa it is challenging. So if we ask ourselves as to what extent should Christianity be indigenized in Africa and remain candid to the cardinal teachings of the Bible? The Bible should be an anchor when it comes to the indigenization of Christianity in Africa.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barrett, David B. Schism & Renew in Africa in Africa, Oxford University Press, 1970
Bujo, Benezet (Ed). Africa Theology: The Contribution of the Pioneers, Nairobi: Pauline’s Publications Africa, 2002
Getui, Mary N. Theological Methods & Aspects of Worship in African Christianity, Nairobi: Acton Publishers 1990
Isichel, Elizabeth A History of Christianity in Africa William Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1995.
Mbiti, John S. The African Religion & Philosophy, New York: Doubleday & Co. Inc, 1970
Mugambi, J.N.K. African Christian Theology, Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1997
Mugambi, J.N.K. African Heritage and Contemporary Christianity, Nairobi: Longman Kenya Ltd, 1989
Ngewa, Samuel ed. Issues in African Christian Theology, Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1998
Nthamburi, Zablon J. Ecclesiology of African Independent Churches, Nairobi, Action Publishers, 1998.
Osabutey, Isaac D. The African Religion & Philosophy, Nairobi: Maillu Publishing House,
Wilbur, O’Donovan. Biblical Christianity in Africa Perspective, Kwara state, Nigeria, Paternoster press, 1996.


[1] Mbiti, John S. The African Religion & Philosophy, New York: Doubleday & Co. Inc, 1970, p. 98
[2] Mugambi, J.N.K. African Heritage and Contemporary Christianity, Nairobi: Longman Kenya Ltd, 1989, p. 134

[3] Gwinyai Muzorewa. The Origin and Development of African Theology, New York, Orbis Books, 1985, p. 39
[4] Mugambi, J.N.K. African Christian Theology, Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1997, p.47
[5] Mugambi, p. 136
[6] Nthamburi, Zablon J. Ecclesiology of African Independent Churches, Nairobi, Action Publishers, 1998, p. 78
[7] Isichel, Elizabeth A History of Christianity in Africa William Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995, p. 151
[8] Osabutey, Isaac D. The African Religion & Philosophy, Nairobi: Maillu Publishing House,1989, p. 101
[9] Ngewa, Samuel ed. Issues in African Christian Theology, Nairobi: East African Educational Publishers, 1998, p. 19
[10] Ngewa, p. 145
           [11] Ngewa, p. 147
          [12] Getui, Mary N. Theological Methods & Aspects of Worship in African Christianity, Nairobi: Acton Publishers 1990, p. 13
         [13] Wilbur, O’Donovan. Biblical Christianity in Africa Perspective, Kwara state, Nigeria, Paternoster press, 1996, p. 56
[14] Barrett, David B. Schism & Renew in Africa in Africa, Oxford University Press, 1970, p.91
           [15] Bujo, Benezet (Ed). Africa Theology: The Contribution of the Pioneers, Nairobi: Pauline’s Publications Africa, 2002, p.121